View Single Post
Old 01-10-2004, 01:06 AM   #19
John D Harris
Ninja Storm Shadow
 

Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 63
Posts: 3,577
Quote:
Originally posted by Night Stalker:
JD

If PATRIOT ACT is NOT found Unconstitutional then the time for Revolution is at hand. The Constitution very explicitly states that a law such as PATRIOT ACT should never have been authored, let alone signed into law.

No legal hair splitting can get around this. If the Supremes fail in their duty to strike this law down, then all three branches of Gubmint are in colusion and have abandoned any pretense of checks and balances. It is then that they have broken their trust with the People and the People need to revoke their Consent granting the Gubmint it's authority.

The Government rules with the consent of the Goverened. ~Voltaire

Also, more troubling than PATRIOT ACT are the expanded powers granted to the FBI that Pres Bush signed into law the day Saddam Hussein was captured. Haven't heard much about that one in the news. Chewie started a thread on that here in CD.

As it is, the US Gubmint long ago sold it's integrity to Corporate and Special Intrests. Or why can the RIAA use ex-cops dressed in mock ATF/FBI/DEA style jackets to threaten suspected copyright pirates to relinquish property, with out being locked down by law enforcement for vigilanteeism?
Source. Note, I'll start a new topic on this one. Keep this thread on the Unconstitutional PATRIOT ACT.
Like it or not, but according to the Constitution of the USA any bill that is passed by a majority of both Houses of Congress, then signed by the President is LAW. Legal president has ADDED that the SCoUS can deside if a law is constitutional or not.

As for revoking the consent you may not get any arguement here. Just don't try to give me the "sky is falling, the end is near, all hope is lost" lines. Or any other emotional horse and pony show. I'm not impressed by "coulda's, kinda's, or mighta's without some evidence to back it up. If presented with the choice between a chance of "Coulda X" happening because there exists the possiblity of it happening, or "Coulda Y" happening again(as in it has already happened once) I'm going to be more worried about "Coulda Y". ie: I'm more worried about a tornado destroying buildings in my town, then an asteroid.
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working.
Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864
66:KIA 5008
67:KIA 9378
68:KIA 14594
69:KIA 9414
70:KIA 4221
71:KIA 1380
72:KIA 300

Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585
2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting

Davros 1
Much abliged Massachusetts
John D Harris is offline   Reply With Quote