12-19-2003, 11:59 AM
|
#7
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Sorry, MagiK, the US Supreme Court will hold the same way I'm afraid. Well, let me preface that: I haven't read the articles or opinion this morning. I'm dying to but I just gotta head off to take care of somehting. So, I don't know exactly how for the Wacky Circuit went, but I AM sure the US SUpreme Court will require that they have access to lawyers.
Oh, and I think the declaration of war must be done country-by-country, not just broadly against all evildoers. But, Iraq was an ONGOING war. 
|
May be, we will see, there is a lot of legal wrangling left to do. As for Declaration in the official sense country by country was how it was done for "traditional and Conventional" wars. We have had acknowledment by several Congressional panels that this new breed of Terror organization that may pose a threat to Whole nations, means that new definitions will be required. Going on Nationlal Television with the backing of both the House and the Senate means it was at least "unoficially" declared.
In the end, There will be new definitions resulting from 9/11 and groups like A.Q.
|
|
|
|