|
And in taking a life how is society different from the criminal?
I am PRO-LIFE.
How's this for an ideal: Make the concept of a human prematurely ending another humans life incomprehensible.
No death penalty, no abortion, no euthenasia, no murder, no war. No humans ending human life.
If it's going to start somewhere, it has to be from the top. The government should lead by example.
"It is wrong under ANY circumstance to end another humans life, so we will not either... no death penalty".
Therefore, we remove the vigillante, remove a certain scenario when a person takes the law into their own hands. The idea that somehow, they are justified in ending human life because there ARE cases where it is "o.k."
[ 11-24-2003, 09:00 PM: Message edited by: Yorick ]
|