Without commenting on the substance, I would advise that you first do what (most) all academic writers of any merit do -- back up, take what you've written as "brainstorming," create an outline broken down into discreet points, and reintegrate your work into that outline. Ideas, however merit-ful they may be, must be conveyed to others.
From the posts herein, you may gather that you have not done that as efficiently as it could be done.
Let me use an example. Friday, I began work on a large project for a client, containing four separate parts. I worked around 30 hours on it from Friday to Monday, creating a huge memorandum addressing the four issues. Since Monday, I have ripped the memo into four memos, rewritten them all, added a summary chart for one memo, added a bullet-point summary for another, and am currently (yes, right now) working on an overall strategy outline to convey all these ideas in a congealed way to the client and my bosses. These work like layers of an onion, with the "skinny" versions given up front and more detail accessible (the "fat") on the issues, should the reader/reviewer desire more detail, accessible beneath the first layers. All of this has changed my initial conclusions little, but has served to make them more accessible to the audience of my documents. Ergo... go do an outline.
[ 11-14-2003, 12:26 AM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ]