|
The "out-of-context" argument is so overused in this day and age.
What else could he have meant? What possible context makes those remarks acceptable? As usual these days, when this type of defense is offered, no elaboration is made as to what was meant.
The media do have much to answer for when they do take a persons words out of context, but in a case like this, with words like this, when no context is described, it reeks of "stock-standardness".
|