View Single Post
Old 09-05-2003, 06:06 PM   #12
Timber Loftis
40th Level Warrior
 

Join Date: July 11, 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 11,916
Quote:
Originally posted by Moiraine:
Bah Chewie, the U.N. is not yet in Iraq ! What the U.S. basically ask the U.N., is that they send troops, provided the U.S. be in command ...

No, really. "Look, guys, I wiped my ass with the Charter I signed and I owe you money that I don't intend to pay soon, now come join me. You'll do the dirty job and I'll lead. Is that OK ?"

Should the U.S. been dismantled as irrelevant ? [img]tongue.gif[/img]
Why don't we just pull out and let Iraq simply fall into despotism? Bet the UN will jump in then.

That Charter, as amended by stupid agreements since then, ain't worth toilet paper.

Oh, and the UN sending in troops so long as the US will be in command bit. That would be the exact opposite of the normal situaiton. It's been US troops bleeding under the UN banner since Korea, as far as I can tell.

I think a new wave of isolationism is in order. F*** everyone else.
__________________
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote