View Single Post
Old 09-04-2003, 05:58 PM   #35
Iron_Ranger
Symbol of Cyric
 

Join Date: August 18, 2002
Location: Where Eagles Dare
Age: 37
Posts: 1,391
I think its a bit naive too think they were against 'hasty war making'. They were against any action at all, imo.

So Bush said no nation building pre-presidency, that kind of adds a whole new dimintion to things. Of course that brings me back too my point of presidential policies changing. And brings you back your point of no need at all for nation building, and so on and so on. Here is how I see it. Bush went into the 2000 election's not expecting to go to war. Sept 11th happened, went to war in Afghanistan, for the sake of preventing more terror to the US we attacks Iraq with out UN support (Or at least, with out support of alot of big names.), thus is forced to 'nation build'. And so we are back too wether we should have attacked at all. My answer is yes, because evidence seems factual as of now. Yours is vice versa. Circular Disscuison anyone?

As for the link I posted, my point was, China found Japaness wmd's 60 years (!) after the Japaness were leaving the country. Iraq could be more of the same.
__________________
<br />[url]\"http://www.bratgirlcentral.com/cgi-bin/ouapforum/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi\" target=\"_blank\">Once Upon A Paper</a><br />Living on a razors edge<br />Balancing on ledge<br />Living on a razors edge
Iron_Ranger is offline   Reply With Quote