Quote:
Originally posted by Animal:
Killing someone in war is one thing, making them suffer while killing them is completely different. If Saddam had used napalm, I'm willing to bet there would be a much bigger fuss.
|
I bet that would depend on IF Iraq had signed the treaty saying they wouldn't use Napalm. Something the USA DIDN'T do, but I guess since it was a treaty then EVERYBODY must be held to it even if they didn't sign it. And since that is now the case "Hale" let's do away with treaties alltogether and just tell everybody this is what you can do and can't do.
Ladies and gentlemen The purpose of WAR is to kill, breaking things is a bonus. The more people try to make war "nice and humane" the more likey it is to be accepted.