Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post - Same sex marriages. Your opinon? Volume two.

Night Stalker · 08-08-2003, 04:14 PM

Also Sir K, sex for reproductive purposes is not related to sex for sexual purposes. The existance of one does not obviate the other. Just because (before scientific help) the only way for species propagation is M-F sexual relations does not mean "that's the way it's supposed to be" vs other sexual relations. Many species "learn the ropes" so to speak with homosexual conduct until the individuals mature enough to move up to the big games of the mating rituals.

The existance of one or the other neither lends legitimacy to nor obviates the other.

EDIT: In fact, noting that homosexual behaviour occurs in nature as well shows that is just as natual.

[ 08-08-2003, 04:20 PM: Message edited by: Night Stalker ]

08-08-2003, 04:14 PM	#15
Night Stalker Lord Ao Join Date: June 24, 2002 Location: Nevernever Land Age: 51 Posts: 2,002	Also Sir K, sex for reproductive purposes is not related to sex for sexual purposes. The existance of one does not obviate the other. Just because (before scientific help) the only way for species propagation is M-F sexual relations does not mean "that's the way it's supposed to be" vs other sexual relations. Many species "learn the ropes" so to speak with homosexual conduct until the individuals mature enough to move up to the big games of the mating rituals. The existance of one or the other neither lends legitimacy to nor obviates the other. EDIT: In fact, noting that homosexual behaviour occurs in nature as well shows that is just as natual. [ 08-08-2003, 04:20 PM: Message edited by: Night Stalker ] __________________ [url]\"http://www.duryea.org/pinky/gurkin.wav\" target=\"_blank\">AYPWIP?</a> .... <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[1ponder]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/1ponder.gif\" /> <br />\"I think so Brain, but isn\'t a cucumber that small called a gherkin?\"<br /><br />Shut UP! Pinky!