07-14-2003, 08:09 PM
|
#52
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rokenn:
Just to refresh your memory here is the topic of this thread:
quote:
It seems to me that with the mounting evidence that the Administration embellished, or may have even out-right lied, about the reasons for war in Iraq. This coupled with the deep ties to Enron, makes me wonder if the republicans are showing a bit of a double standard toward presidential conduct. If there was a dem in the office with all the mounting evidence they would be drafting an army of special prosecutors to tear em down.
Here is some of the latest info to come to light:
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/06/opinion/06WILS.html
|
The topic of this thread is that if it had been a Democratic president that told these embleshments we would be hip deep in special prosecutors. Instead the spineless Dems in the Congrss/Senate are being, well spineless Democrats. When the Great Clinton Witchhunt began the evidence was much flimsier then this.
Also can you truthfully tell me that if Clinton had gone after Saddam he would not have been smacked with 'Wag the Dog' spin? [/QUOTE]
Seems to me that you ignored the fact that the whole thread has gotten off track and has turned into a free for all Anti-Bush and Anti-Admin rant. And it also is my opinion that many of the posts and posters in that camp have played fast and loose with the niggling details and truth....but then we have already firmly established that it is ok to be less than perfect with the details if it is against Bush and the Admin...but if you are someone who is ont he other side of the issue....well people on that side of the fence have no business having an opinion and are frowned upon for pointing out those minor details.
|
|
|
|