Quote:
Originally posted by Cerek the Barbaric:I'll agree that this raises some questions that should be investigated further and answered by President Bush. But as far as your comment about "if he lied about this, what else did he lie about?", that applies to every President and their Cabinets, regardless of political affiliation. There is no irrefutable proof (yet  ) that President Bush lied, but there is irrefutable proof that his predecessor did. If Clinton lied about Lewinsky (and he finally, reluctantly admitted that he did), then what else did he lie about?
The "Accusation Avenue" runs both ways and neither side is spotless or blameless.
|
Thanks for talking to the point I've been trying to make. The endless investagations of Clinton were started over much less reliable information then this. Also the allegations Ambassador Wilson was investagating had already been reported and debunked by Ambassador Owens-Kirkpatrick. So as he stated his findings were nothing new or earth-shattering.
Also as I posted already someone lying about there sex life is not something we should really care about. Someone lying about national security is.