Quote:
|
But we have to keep in mind that in the global warming debate, an overwelming majority of the scientific community acknowledges global warming. The anti global-warming scientifics represents only a small minority heavily funded by corporate interests (read oil industry)
|
actually the majority of environmental scientists claim that there is not enough evidence to make a conclusion one way or the other,the next largest group are those that say it's not happening,and the smallest being the alarmists who claim global warming is mans fault.is there any one here besides me who is old enough to remember the first earth day?back then the alarmists were claiming that pollution was going to cause a new ice age.please!these people can't predict the weather reliably ten days in advance,how can they be expected to predict it 100 years in advance.
anyone who thinks man is destroying the planet should look to the planet for the real culprit.the 1991 mount pinatubo eruption poured more ozone depleting chemicals into the atmosphere than man has in his entire history.1000 time more.