lroyo

I'm not sure what you are getting at here K T!

Science is proven every single day, and although some of it is nothing but theories, it is based on actual fact, and doesn't just rely on faith.

Aviendha.[/QUOTE]Science is not proven at all. Far from it in fact. Just because the physical "laws" we have coincide with what has been observed so far doesn't mean that they are like that, for one thing our observations could all have been wrong, we might lack the senses to sense half of what is going on around us.

The "true" physical laws might actually allow for a God, or for spirits, or for anything, really. Prove Science to me and I will stop believing in any form of religion.[/QUOTE]Neb, I wonder where these “true” physical laws that you speak of originate from. Can you please tell me what the “true” physical laws are, because I obviously have not been made aware of them.

It is very easy for you to make a statement like “science is not proven”. What you are actually trying to suggest to me is, that since many things in science are not definite, and that there are many things in this universe that we cannot understand, God more than likely exists. I find this sort of statement rather irritating as you have not in fact made any statement at all. I know that there are many things in this universe that we do not yet understand, which we may never understand. But that doesn’t prove that there’s a God any more than a packet of Coco Pops does just because it’s just like a chocolate milkshake only crunchy.

I do not need to prove science to anyone to be happy with my assessment of life. I follow the rules of science, because if I do not, I will more than likely not make it through a day. I can’t walk in front of a car because it will hit me hard. Science says so. If I light a match and throw it on a piece of paper, it will burn. Science says so.
If there is a particular part of science that you don’t believe in, I suggest you raise that as an argument rather than just saying “Science is not proven”. And even then, if you can totally disprove something about science, you still will not have taken a step closer to proving God. If you can disprove evolution, that does not prove the existence of God.

Regardless, I do not need to prove science to disprove God. Also, disproving science does not prove the existence of God. I really do feel that you should be trying to prove the existence of your God, as disproving science will get you nowhere, and as I have stated earlier, nobody has ever proved the existence of God to me.

Aviendha.