sorry for everybody who hates me because i keep talking about it but most of this s**t was told to me by my brother and also my teacher, but right now, in this very room- here he is! the man, the myth(not really): my brother. im sure you will like to beat him up soon. you`ll see
My brother-
Someone out there pointed out that America lost too liitle number of men. I wished to say compared to Russia (13 000 000 troops, 7 000 000 civilians killed) they lost even too much and the reasons:
Civilians, america had no reasons to make at least 7 000 000 civilians tourists to be equal to russians (look how much troops we lost, germany is evil)
They entered too late (1941). They mainly fought the "strong" Japan. Ok, it was strong in the world, but compared to Uncle Sam, who at one point found best to GIVE russians 400 000 trucks, they were mosquitoes on the window, no offense, anyone from japan.
Where did they have to fight? Germany was losing the war the day, it started it. Don't get me wrong, they were very successful and talented, but lets compare them to Russia, who had almost 5 times more tanks (5000 compared to 28 000), plus almost a thousand of german tanks were practically trucks. Germans also had less infantry (almost 3 or more times less). Then there were America (400 000 trucks as a present, what would they use as their own army?) and England. Both of them took shifts in bombing the germans (englands at night and americans at day or reverse, i'm not sure). Germany lost 1000 000 civilians to that. The americans had no reasons to put their troops anywhere, Normandy didn't make the war.
You can't tell an entire country was blood-thirsty. would you agree, that the americans, after 20 years, would be pissed about WTC? Ok, pissed, maybe, but bloodthirsty? They're not really comparable, but still...
Uss, that little worm, wants me to stop writing soon.. Ok, soon..
SS wasn't 100%gang of rapists and such. If some really did that, should we tell the entire army was a gang of rapists? I have a link (
http://www.panzer-prints.com/new_page_1.htm ), telling that the Estonian division wasn't involved with any atrocities, so when I'd like to use your logic, SS was 100% patriotic. Of course, they had nowhere to do atrocities and you might even tell that their atrocities just weren't reported, but i have one thing to say to those, who think this way: Piss off. it's BS.
When russia conquered Berlin (with the pointless help of the other allies), 300 000 women were raped! I don't think the SS got the number so high, although they did have a number, of course.
Someone in holland, who said SS was full of killers and was an immoral thing, should be very f**king shamed! Holland gave the most troops to the SS (50 000), maybe except to germany. You should look it up and tell it to everyone you know.
Why would you flame Uss? Because he was in the wrong side, yes? Well, anyone, who tells him he's nazi because he didn't think he'd like to be in the side of Americans, English nor the russians when talking bout the war, should shut up.
---------------
well, that was my brother. the last part he wrote was a bit wrong. i didnt like the other side because of the Soviets, not the others. ok, everybody, say whatever youve got to say against him. one question: are there any others who were in the side of Nazi?