Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post

Rikard_OHF · 03-12-2002, 01:37 AM

The main problem morally seen is that it's easier to aim a conventional bomb then it is a atom bomb. In other words, when you use a nuke, you are sure innocents are gonna die, if you use conventional bomb (excluding mass destruction weapons like firestroms) you aim for one target
Still it doesn't matter that much since you'll kill innocents one way or another
And furthermore
Even if you could make a bomb that won't leave radioactive waste (which I think is impossible if you use Uranium) The feel is still there, nomatter what you do, Nuclear will always be seen as Mass destroction of innocents

03-12-2002, 01:37 AM	#13
Rikard_OHF Beholder Join Date: March 4, 2001 Location: Het Hertogdom Gelre!!!!! Age: 40 Posts: 4,364	The main problem morally seen is that it's easier to aim a conventional bomb then it is a atom bomb. In other words, when you use a nuke, you are sure innocents are gonna die, if you use conventional bomb (excluding mass destruction weapons like firestroms) you aim for one target Still it doesn't matter that much since you'll kill innocents one way or another And furthermore Even if you could make a bomb that won't leave radioactive waste (which I think is impossible if you use Uranium) The feel is still there, nomatter what you do, Nuclear will always be seen as Mass destroction of innocents __________________ [img]\"http://confed.xl-designs.com/siggeh18.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br /> <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[bunny]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/bunny.gif\" /> Return of the Bunny Army! <img border=\"0\" alt=\"[bunny]\" title=\"\" src=\"graemlins/bunny.gif\" />