Certainly today ranged weapons are really the only mode of engagement. The melee died with... hmm... the end of WWI I would think, when bayonet charges ended.
BUT, back in the days before firearms the archer was important but I would think only as a component of a sound strategy... I don't think it was more important than say cavalry, or the foot soldier (who bore MOST of the burden of combat). The pre-cannon equivelants of artillary could be another important component (ballista, trebuchet, etc...) depending on the circumstances of the engagement.
[ 02-13-2002: Message edited by: Thoran ]
|