quote:
Originally posted by MagiK:
Yo dude I live in the Washington area..I don't know where you find any indication that the Washington Post was anti-clinton...The washington post is acknowledged as one of the more democratic liberall biased paper in the entire mid-atlantic region.. Washington Post = Democratic Liberal slated columns
Washington TIMES however = Rightwing conspiracy theory slanted columns.
The post was very much pro-clinton for all 8 years and continually ignored any attempt at an "even handed" reporting style. I know cause I was here....well from 94 on I was here.
Explain to me why Clinton PERSONALLY backed ENRON and its INDIA projects when commercial creditors wouldnt fund them, and why he always seemed to have ENRON Execs on his overseas junkets. Ive read the rhetoric from both sides, and I know that both sides are dirty in this whole thing, but I also know that any assertion about Bush knowing about or facilitating the ENRON Collapse is at this point BS, because there are so far no documents available to prove it..so it is all speculation He Knows Lay so he knows every thing about themmm You know I have a friend I knew for 25 years and never knew he was gay.....could it be that you can know someone and not know EVERYTHING? Could be.
Hmmm...I think there might be a difference in the analogy of your friend being gay and Bushy knowing about Lays dirty lawndry. Bush and Lay were in the same business together and working in the same town as well (Houston). You are exactly right this Enron stuff goes back to the Clinton years if not further (we might never know since they took it on themselves to shred documents) and for your answer, I'm sure it was considered a "political favor" i.e Clinton owed Enron a favor for large amounts of campain money.