quote:
Originally posted by fable:
"Somewhat evenhanded," is the way the Washington Post, which was anti-Clinton during his heyday, puts it, regarding the company's lobbying efforts.
]
Yo dude I live in the Washington area..I don't know where you find any indication that the Washington Post was anti-clinton...The washington post is acknowledged as one of the more democratic liberall biased paper in the entire mid-atlantic region.. Washington Post = Democratic Liberal slated columns
Washington TIMES however = Rightwing conspiracy theory slanted columns.
The post was very much pro-clinton for all 8 years and continually ignored any attempt at an "even handed" reporting style. I know cause I was here....well from 94 on I was here.
Explain to me why Clinton PERSONALLY backed ENRON and its INDIA projects when commercial creditors wouldnt fund them, and why he always seemed to have ENRON Execs on his overseas junkets. Ive read the rhetoric from both sides, and I know that both sides are dirty in this whole thing, but I also know that any assertion about Bush knowing about or facilitating the ENRON Collapse is at this point BS, because there are so far no documents available to prove it..so it is all speculation He Knows Lay so he knows every thing about themmm You know I have a friend I knew for 25 years and never knew he was gay.....could it be that you can know someone and not know EVERYTHING? Could be.