Sorry Donut I don't buy it
I know too many real life meteorologists who admit they don't have the Data, the NAS is not an independant unbiased entity. Where do they get their money?? who writes their checks and makes the multi-million $$$ donations??? The models used are flawed, they don't even take into account the effects of minor things like volcanic eruptions, outgassing of CO2 from the seabed (which by the way is amazing to see when you are in a small sailboat) such small things as the great lakes, or even some failry major ocean currents. Nope they don't know and won't admit it because they know wherre their money comes from. As for the studies Absynthe talks about, its easy to put out a "study" the problem is that the studies are not unbiased. You don't get government grant money if you report that there is no problem. There are just as many studies that refute global warming is affected by people as there are that go the other way....the groups that are saying that man is to fault for global warming are the same ones that told me a few years ago that the Amazon Rain forest would be extinct in the late 1990's they lost their credibility.
------------------
Disintigration is easy, If you really want to impress me, ReIntegrate it.
[This message has been edited by MagiK (edited 09-05-2001).]