quote:
Originally posted by Dramnek_Ulk:
Actually scientific proof is contingent on something not comeing along to disprove it. nothing yet can disprove evollution, nor offer a viable alternative therefore evolution in all its forms could be considred the most plausible scientific truth of the moment.
What science has discovered does not mirror that of the bible and to even suggest so is preposterous. Were heaven and earth all created on 4004 b.c? i think not.
Actually NO scientific proof is just that, proof. It is false UNTIL proven, it's not a trial in the US, it's science. If you want to show something is true in science, you MUST prove it, until the it is considered false.
There is no way to disprove creation, and it was around long before evolutionist ideas, and it is indeed very plausible, therefore by your own words creation is the true one of the two choices. You may want to rethink your argument there.... because logic trending that direction entirely supports creation, in fact that is my logic from a scientific viewpoint.
I am sorry, but nowhere in the bible does it say that everything was created in 4004 B.C. so that is irrelevant in the extreme. A rumor started somewhere, no doubt.