Quote:
Originally posted by Sir Real:
There can be no truth with out proof, scientific or otherwise. For oh can something be true if you have no evidence to back up the claim, I could say that you have to heads is a truth but is not because I have no truth to prove it.
You cann't say religion is truth because religion is FAITH and FAITH is (as sataed the the dictionary) strong belief without proof; religion; complete condfidence or trust; allegince to a person or cause.
SO if you have faith in god it means you have belief in god which means you believe he exists even without proof. But is you take the second meaning without belief then you have no religion as faith is the back bone of any religion, it would be like me having condfidene that a chiar will not break when I sit on it, but I have not belief that the chair exist.
|
Ahhh, but to a person with faith, that faith makes things true. To a scientist with a theory, faith will not make it true. He must have proof. And he has none. so therefore he is deluding himself. you are viewing it solely from a scientific perspective, while I am viewing it from both sides, and I feel I am qualified to do so. From a scientific perspective, I cannot say that creation is false, unless I prove that evolution is true. At this point I cannot prove that, so for now I must accept creation as truth. Many scientists refuse to do this, even though they have no proof, as, IMO it means they aren't as all knowing as they like to think. My opinions come not from my faith, although this also screams them at me, but from a clear scientific perspective of the situation as it stands thus far, not clouded by a desire to disprove God in the universe.
------------------
"Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans." - Lennon