[quote]Originally posted by Memnoch:
Yorick, those responses *were* a bit out of line, mate, even though Dramnek may have been flamebaiting with his somewhat extreme views. Namecalling never helps. It's out of character for you to resort to namecalling, since you're normally the voice of reason and restraint! 
Just so that Yorick's comments can be put in context, this was Yorick's first post, discussing his reasons for his belief in God:
This was Dramnek's comment to Yorick's post:
[quote]Posted by Dramnek:
Here the burden of proof is being shifted. It is obvious from daily life(innocent chldren dieing, people suffering, "Natural evil" and the fragmentation of religion) that there is almost no evidence that a god exists. The evidence that a god does not exist is based on clear cut and logical evidence. The "evidence" that god exists is based on emotion with little grounding in the real world. There is already undeniable evidence god does not exist, its just that peoples emotions get in the way of thinking about it. Since Christians belive in this strange and illogical idea of some kind of human like figure that created us all, and all the evidence points to there being no god,then they should be the ones to prove a god exists.
Quote:
Yorick then replied with his posts above. Understandable given Dramnek's inflammatory post, but uncalled for, sorry mate! 
|
why did you not do anything about this at the time of yoricks insulting posts, surely it is a part of a moderators job to stop abuse and insults like these?
[This message has been edited by Dramnek_Ulk (edited 10-21-2001).]