[Sir Taliesin]

Originally posted by Diogenes Of Pumpkintown: I agree with those who said above that the choice between Gore and Bush was a sad choice indeed. Nader would have been better than either one.

If anyone thinks our economy is in bad shape now, just imagine what it would have been like with Nader as the Supreme Commander! We'd all be on welfare, because no one could work, unless they were a bureaucrat.

Al Gore is a stuff shirt, who likes to throw big words around and show how smart he is. Can't and never could stand him since I became an adult. at least with Bush, we get to see Will Farrow on SNL a lot more! Besides, Bush has done a good job as President. Clitler, I mean Clinton, himself said the other day that he was a great politician!

Someone mentioned Colin Powell as a president. I think he would have made a fine one!!! He definatly would have got my vote!!! I think the world of him!
Truely a great man!!!

Kyoto Treaty... Never happen, regardless of who became President. Clinton, only gave it lip service at best and never truely supported it. If he had we would have probably signed it.

Also someone else said something earlier about Bush saying and doing anything for a vote. You don't think Al Gore wouldn't either? How many times did Al Gore say one thing in one place and turn around and say the opposite in another, during the election. They are all politicains. That's what they do.
It doesn't matter if it's here in the States or in Australia. They are all a like.


------------------
Sir Taliesin



If they take my gun can I still use my Axe?

[This message has been edited by Sir Taliesin (edited 08-13-2001).]