|
Memnoch, you are mostly right, at times "having to wade through spam" can become an annoyance. But ! How do you want objectively differentiate between posts, especially between the ones that fall under either C or D of your categorization ?
Do you want to set up a jury to judge questionable posts ? So while your analysis is accurate, I do not think it will help very much in terms of solving the problem, if there is so much of a problem in the first place. People will read your post, agree with you, but most will simply not identify themselves as "guilty" of spamming even if they had reason to. Just look at the responses to this thread.
I would rather trust in CB's forecast to become true. Just wait and see. If things have not toned down within a couple of weeks, we will have to adress the problem again.
On a much more serious matter: never dare to lay your filthy hands on Choc
again ! Do you hear me ? Otherwise I will call PETA and then all these supermodels they used to have in their anti-fur ads will come to haunt you ...
wait a minute ! This was supposed to be a warning not an incentive. Damn it !
------------------
So long !
R³ - Co-president(s) of the Club of Broken Hearts
|