Quote:
Originally posted by Darkman:
Am I the only one who is disappointed that they are using a real life model for this issue? I was at first impressed that Playboy would branch out so far as to try something revolutionary like doing a spread with a computer animated woman, but of course they are incapbable of breaking out of the same tired formulaic crap they peddle. But damn, they could have at least picked a better RL model to pose as Bloodrayne. I wasn't at all impressed with Kristinna Loken in Terminator 3. Even with the ridiculous push-up bra she was wearing in the movie she still fell far short of spectacular if you ask me. I honestly see way hotter girls than her on campus every day.
How typical of Playboy to pass up a great opportunity like this only to select a B-rate actrice with average Hollywood looks. Even if a pixelated chick wouldn't have appealed to everyone, it would have at least been something different. That magazine needs a major dosage of fresh air. I can't see why so many people still support the crap they put out.
|
Why would they put picture of naked cg character in playboy? Even on the net there are very few people that would like that, it certainly wouldn't be a success with playboy's customers...