10-01-2003, 09:33 PM
|
#10
|
Jack Burton 
Join Date: May 31, 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 5,854
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CerebroDragon:
quote: Originally posted by 605:
There were a few Dragonlance games back in the day... none of which were that good. One was actually as popular as to get onto the NES, where it flopped horribly I'm sure. There were a few old PC games I played too, tho most were so short and easy or long and impossible it wasn't even worth playing them.
|
Bah! Blasphemy! I refute this kind of blind dogmatic ignorance! [img]tongue.gif[/img] [img]smile.gif[/img]
Perhaps you are referring to Dragons of Flame or Heroes of the Lance? Hmmph!
The AD&D Gold box Dragonlance Trilogy was a brilliant series of RPGs which I for one spent many years of my early high school days exploring within.
Champtions of Krynn, Deathknights of Krynn and The Dark Queen of Krynn - all using the same yet modified engine as the Forgotten Realms stuff: Pool of Radiance, Curse of the Azure Bonds, Secret of the Silver Blades and Pools of Darkness. These games are recognised as out and out classics and I'm sure many of the more experienced and more knowledgeable RPG gamers would agree.
Champions of Krynn started at level two and was probably my favourite through its 'sweet-spot of levelling, yet The Dark Queen of Krynn was noticably more upgraded and featured some of the toughest encounters ever seen in these games.
Thus, Dragonlance games have already been done, even if they are not page for page adaptions ofthe original Chronicles or Twins Trilogy, they are still highly worth playing for any dragonlance or AD&D fan. [/QUOTE]I never could stand that old SSI engine...too old or sumfin'. I was hooked on Menzoberranzan.
__________________
Still I feel like a child when I look at the moon, maybe I grew up a little too soon...
|
|
|