Quote:
Originally posted by Lord Lothar:
Diablo 1 followed by Diablo 2. I don't care if some people here don't consider them RPGs but I do. Those 2 were the most addictive games I've ever played. Those 2 followed by BG2.
|
Ick...yes, you got that right, Diablo and Diablo 2 do not qualify as RPG's despite the fact that they contain elements of role playing (classes, characters, treasure seeking)...
Perhaps Diablo 3 might actually add some depth to the series, if Blizzard get around to it. They have alot of potential, but its just a pity that they lack any depth at all.
No offense, but I finished Diablo in a day and Diablo II in about a week...they are much too shallow of a game experience to call an RPG. Compare that with Baldur's Gate II's two months, and the results are incomparable in terms of quality and depth of role playing.
The only time I'll ever play either Diablo now is during a LAN, as their multiplayer action makes them somewhat enjoyable.