This is quite the gathering you guys have started here! Too bad for you it wont last.
And this one is for Hellfire:
Something is happening here, and I'm getting a little worried. Unless you share my view that Hellfire's drones don't want to make their own decisions but want Hellfire to do their thinking for them, there's no need for you to hear me further. In contrast, you should not ask, "Why does he want to impose corrupt new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of confused drive for power?", but rather, "Why do we put up with him?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because if I recall correctly, I and Hellfire part company when it comes to the issue of scapegoatism. He feels that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of lethargic stereotypes, while I claim that his devotees care more about speaking, acting, and even thinking like Hellfire than they care about what makes sense. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that it's astounding that Hellfire has found a way to work the words "physicophilosophical" and "scientificogeographical" into his propositions. However, you may find it even more astounding that if we detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart his randy, wild schemes, then the sea of alarmism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. Hellfire should clarify his point, so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, Hellfire's deeds sound lofty and include some emotionally charged words but don't really seem to make any sense. People tell me that he can't be trusted. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. Although headlong, flippant commercialism is now and has long been a mainstay of Hellfire's half-measures, we are here to gain our voice in this world, and whether or not he approves, we will continue to be heard.
Be afraid, be very afraid!!!
|