View Single Post
Old 12-26-2000, 11:24 PM   #5
Blade_Firestorm
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

But you must remember this.
A Paladin is always a Knight.
But a Knight is not always a Paladin.
Just because a Paladin serves a Holy Cause in his own eyes dosn't mean he isn't a Knight and have the Noble right to rule over his own land.
I just thought if Nalia wanted anyone to rule her Keep she would want one who is Knightly and meant to rule.
BTW this is Historically accurate and in the BG2 Description of a Paladin(Cavalier).