Thanks for replying but nope, still don't wash.
He can become equally proficient in a weapon that he's never even been near as one that he constantly uses....stupid. He progresses and gains all proficiencies as he should in thief levels although he devotes only a tiny fraction of his time to thieving as opposed to fighting....silly.
If he was a mage/thief is it therefore correct to assume that he can't cast/learn the same amount of spells as a mage because he can't devote as much time to magery as a mage would with the same stat's.....baffling.
What advantages does a fighter/thief actually gain in terms of the fighter side of things? Name only? He can wear a bit of armour....is that it?...so can a cleric that also gains the same weapon proficiencies and can cast spells.
Anyone else have thoughts on this or can perhaps enlighten me a little regarding this mis-named false class type.
|