View Single Post
Old 03-23-2004, 01:29 PM   #41
Argonnes
Elite Waterdeep Guard
 

Join Date: March 10, 2004
Location: Arizona
Age: 54
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally posted by ferro287:
Heh, "a bit offtopic" sounds nice [img]smile.gif[/img]

You're right on the distances part, but ofc all those formulae should out globally. But unfortunately trying to apply quantum theory to relativity or the other way around results in contradictions. Many ppl try to unify those, but noone knows how to. Iirc the search is called "Theory of Everything" (but don't crucify me if that's something else, I'm just a mathematician [img]tongue.gif[/img] )

Edit: Ok, Argonnes beat me. But I wasn't thinking of special, rather of general relativity. Wasn't that Superstring theory, and all those troubles? Or am I on the wrong track here?
GUT, Grand Unified Theory...it's all about some how bringing all the main known forces together; electromagnetic, nuclear weak, nuclear strong, and gravitational. So far, we've been able to tie the two nuclears together and have been able to get a little bit of a tie with the electromagnetic to the nuclears as well.

As to Superstring, I never went that far into Quantum. Mostly, the dealings I had were with nucleons (Proton, Neutron, Electron, and antimatter versions along with replacement particles like the Muon).
__________________
Einstein said Everything is Relative.<br />Heisenberg said Everything is Uncertain.<br />Therefore, Everything is relatively uncertain.
Argonnes is offline   Reply With Quote