Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post

EEWorzelle · 09-03-2003, 08:27 PM

Wow, excellent catch, Sultan.

Somebody actually measured it!

Okay, so it's 4% (5% for Ninja with bonus).

I haven't been posting (or even reading) on that board. Any word on whether it's fractional or just at 25 Skill Point jumps?

I read the post you linked and agree with Otter's Samurai development advice, too. Strength and Dexterity, then Senses, forget Int and Powercast for the Samurai. That's the way I develop mine, too.

But what I am asking for is if there are other threads you know of where this is gone into more, where players discussing observations like yours (which are excellent by the way).

I would call your, may I say brilliant experiment, convincing verification of what Otter posted. It is as good as I have ever seen on these boards. Very cool!

Scott's estimates, based upon his observations, were getting closer to those numbers also, which is additional "reality check" type verification for them.

[ 09-03-2003, 08:33 PM: Message edited by: EEWorzelle ]

09-03-2003, 08:27 PM	#45
EEWorzelle Manshoon Join Date: October 25, 2002 Location: Gilbert, Az Age: 72 Posts: 234	Wow, excellent catch, Sultan. Somebody actually measured it! Okay, so it's 4% (5% for Ninja with bonus). I haven't been posting (or even reading) on that board. Any word on whether it's fractional or just at 25 Skill Point jumps? I read the post you linked and agree with Otter's Samurai development advice, too. Strength and Dexterity, then Senses, forget Int and Powercast for the Samurai. That's the way I develop mine, too. But what I am asking for is if there are other threads you know of where this is gone into more, where players discussing observations like yours (which are excellent by the way). I would call your, may I say brilliant experiment, convincing verification of what Otter posted. It is as good as I have ever seen on these boards. Very cool! Scott's estimates, based upon his observations, were getting closer to those numbers also, which is additional "reality check" type verification for them. [ 09-03-2003, 08:33 PM: Message edited by: EEWorzelle ]