Excellent [img]smile.gif[/img]
Here's today's quote for you to chew on:
Quote:
|
KryTen, I was just thinking. Assuming of course we're not dealing with five-dimensional objects in a basic Euclidean geometric universe and given the essential premise that all geo-mathematics is based on the hideously limiting notion that one plus one equals two, and not as Ustermeyer correctly postulates that one and two are in fact the same thing observed from different precepts, [snorts] the theoretical shapes described by Sidis must therefore be a poly-dri-doc-dec-ahooey-hedron, a-hexa-sexa-hedro-adecon, and a di-bi-dolly-he-deca-dodron. [snorts again] Everything else is poppycock. Isn't that so?
|