|
I think the point of those two feats is just to get the one extra attack. I agree though, it is pretty expensive. Not only do you spend the two feats, but you still take a minus on the to-hit roll whenever you use two weapons (-2/-4 or -2/-2). If your a fighter and getting lots of feats anyways it could be worth it though.
I think 3.5 did away with ambidexterity because people found all the different 2 weapon fighting cases confusing, despite the fact that they were all listed neatly in a table somewhere. Or maybe it had something to do with them reworking the ranger abilities.
|