[ister]

I'm playing a DC party right now. Bard, F[4]-T, R[7]-C, F[9]-Transmuter, F[10?]-D.

I almost always DC-ed in Baldur's Gate.

I'm a little disappointed in the F->T. He's no longer a great archer, and the backstab doesn't make up for it. Yes I DC-ed him early, but I can't stand working without a thief for so long. I really think that the MC F/T is better. And I agree with the previous posts, KF you didn't really want a F/M/T.

I'm beginning to believe that Druids are extremely powerful as spell casters, so I'm rethinking my opinion on that too. I'd rather have the Druid available for longer, and not worry so much about hit points. I think I really like the early DC for the druid over the F/D in order to get to higher levels a little quicker.

For the F/M I think the story is quite different. GM and 9 levels of hit points make this guy extremly nasty in tough fights, and as long as you have another spell caster you don't need the spell casting active early on. This is one DC that I really do like.

And I have tried the F/C and F-C. I think each has it's advantages.

However, I always be inclined to have one character that can get to GM in a weapon. It's just so handy.

[ 09-26-2005, 10:48 AM: Message edited by: ister ]