[Lymond]

NobleNick,

Yes, that was your analysis now that I think of it. I didn't remember it was you because I didn't really "know" you at the time. That was a big help.

Pritchke,

I would definitely split some at six and some at nine. I had never dual classed before, so I was very anxious to do so and then did at six. Now that I'm much past that, I wish I had waited. I've also never tried HoF, so I think that's next on the list.

Shotgun,

I never thought I'd like a bard so much. A character that doesn't fight?! I'm a beleiver now, though. I'm not a big fan of the ranger, although I do have a ranger/cleric. The first time I played a ranger I think I had his enemy as a goblin, which you don't see enough in the game. This time I made the prime enemy a skeletal undead and it's been much more useful. With the right weapon, she frequently crushes skeletons in one blow. As far as killing off one of the team, I don't like to do that, because I feel like I wasted the experience points. However, better that than to be stuck later with a weak party. If you are planning to dual class the ranget to cleric, then I would get rid of the full cleric and play a bard instead.

Lymond