When reading a post about whether wizards or warriors were better i thought of a pretty neat party. You have:-
A pure mage
2 scpecialist mages of opposite shcools
A pure fighter
A fighter/thief (multiclass)
A fighter/cleric (multiclass)
This would mean you would have 3 pairs of mage fighters meaning you could attack a large enemy group from 3 sides.
Please tell me your opinions on it.
------------------
Bonzo
"the important thing is not to be right or wrong
but to be certain. Being right helps of course."
[This message has been edited by Bonzo (edited 07-14-2001).]