[Lord Brass]

Even stalwart KAK members cannot (in good conscience) proselytize a "concentration-camp" mentality. If the Kobold is to be shown due consideration amongst the species of the Sword Coast, we must extend to them the very cornerstone foundations of society that we hold dear.

However, we should not simple promote such an activity without consideration for the majority of the Sword Coast peoples. If Kobolds are given a sanction of free-reign, we cannot expect them to do aught but live up to their reputations. Others will suffer, and that is what we are trying to avoid. Mr Underhill is trying at least to seek an activity-based (early) learning centre approach with his Kobold community village. For that he is to be commended, but we are still waiting for solid proof of positive feedback from the camp. Our beloved Chair Legolas has requested an update as such, if I may speak on Legolas' behalf, yet none has been forthcoming.

KAK's other concerns haven't been addressed in any capacity either. We fear for the social/political strata of (pre-Reformation) Kobold society. I believe that it is egregious on the part of BYOB that a KAK member must ask about the welfare of a Kobold. I state this in the firm hope that others will not see KAK as a mere bludgeon with which to keep the Kobolds in their present sorry state.

May I also state that it is good to see young memebers of Faerûn society so willing to invest their time and money on an in-depth (and hopefully) substantial review of the present geo-political theatre of the modern Sword Coast demographic. Progress at last?