Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post

toriuxik · 12-12-2001, 09:56 PM

Of course, even if you are using stoneskin, elemental damage still gets through. Yep, that 10 damage from the FotA gets to hit you still. Cleric can gate in a Pit Fiend pretty darn fast. Thats quite a distraction.

OR AS I SAID BEFORE, CLERIC COULD USE ANTIMAGIC SCROLL AND THE MAGE CAN'T DO ****. Its all circumstance.

Mages aren't more flexible, as they have to know whats coming more than clerics do. You can't give a mage a contingency without having given the cleric time to cast spells before the fight as well, and say the cleric gates in 6 or 7 pit fiends and beefs them up? Your mage won't last very long against all that (send them in 1 at a time to make you waste your horid wiltings ect).

It is obvious, that since we can both find a circumstance when the other would win, that neither is more powerful.

I agree, lets end the bickering part.

12-12-2001, 09:56 PM	#67
toriuxik Banned Smartass Join Date: November 26, 2001 Location: Who cares Posts: 216	Of course, even if you are using stoneskin, elemental damage still gets through. Yep, that 10 damage from the FotA gets to hit you still. Cleric can gate in a Pit Fiend pretty darn fast. Thats quite a distraction. OR AS I SAID BEFORE, CLERIC COULD USE ANTIMAGIC SCROLL AND THE MAGE CAN'T DO ****. Its all circumstance. Mages aren't more flexible, as they have to know whats coming more than clerics do. You can't give a mage a contingency without having given the cleric time to cast spells before the fight as well, and say the cleric gates in 6 or 7 pit fiends and beefs them up? Your mage won't last very long against all that (send them in 1 at a time to make you waste your horid wiltings ect). It is obvious, that since we can both find a circumstance when the other would win, that neither is more powerful. I agree, lets end the bickering part.