Ironworks Gaming Forum - View Single Post - Is a Kensai/Mage better than a Fighter/Mage?

Albert Rose · 10-11-2004, 05:39 PM

Thanks for the welcomes!

The meat of my question is this: If I start out as a fighter, then dual to mage, is that better than starting out as a kensai, then dualling to mage? It seems to me that a fighter can do anything a kensai can, except for Kai, and has more options on the armor/bracers/missiles front. A fighter=>mage could use the same buffs, and could carve through the naughties just as well as, if not better than, a kensai=>mage.

At least, that's what I thought. I've not done either, though, and was looking for opinions. Thanks for sharing!

The multi-class F/M would be my choice, if playing on through ToB.

10-11-2004, 05:39 PM	#7
Albert Rose Welcomed New User Join Date: September 3, 2004 Location: Winter Park, Florida Age: 53 Posts: 3	Thanks for the welcomes! The meat of my question is this: If I start out as a fighter, then dual to mage, is that better than starting out as a kensai, then dualling to mage? It seems to me that a fighter can do anything a kensai can, except for Kai, and has more options on the armor/bracers/missiles front. A fighter=>mage could use the same buffs, and could carve through the naughties just as well as, if not better than, a kensai=>mage. At least, that's what I thought. I've not done either, though, and was looking for opinions. Thanks for sharing! The multi-class F/M would be my choice, if playing on through ToB.