Quote:
|
In my opinion it's unreasonable to kill a boss in one hit. There's really nothing wrong with having that preference, is there?
|
And I'll repeat, for what's probably the third time now...
Why not make her saves so low that it is an impossibility to not make her save versus death?
Quote:
|
It's "wrong" to do that? I didn't realize this was a question of morality. However, for the sake of discussion, let's grant you that it is wrong to make the game harder for no reason. That wouldn't apply to Tactics either, since Tactics makes it harder for very good reasons. Which have been posted in this thread already.
|
Sorry, I forgot the IMO. But I assumed that since it was me posting, then it would naturally have the IMO tagged on it, since my posts are naturally of my opinion. =/ And I'm talking about making all Lichs immune to Azuredge and Bodhi immune to the spells that affect damn near everything else(in reference to my post about it being wrong
IMO , to make changes for no reason other than to make it harder.
Quote:
|
On your second statement, I would appreciate it if you don't tell me what my line is. I never said that. I have an intelligent limit for what's reasonable in this game, what's justified, and what's story-compatible.
|
I got that impression from this post:
Quote:
|
Yes, that's exactly right Assassin. I believe that a Lich should not die in one hit from an axe.
|
In other words, the only reason why Lichs should be immune to Azuredge is because they're too easy to kill right now. In other words,
IMO , I interpreted it that you were willing to make any changes as long as they made the game harder, with no other reason. What logical, in-game reason would Lichs have to being immune to Azuredge?
Okay, you caught me there. It affect everyone except the two Demi-Lichs and Improved Bodhi. Happpy? [img]tongue.gif[/img]
And no, I'm not against Tactics mod. Hell, I'm a fairly vocal supporter of it (just ask SixOfSpades [img]tongue.gif[/img] ). Where it makes sense (there's no way I'm fighting Improved Faldorn, for example). And this is a case where,
IMO , it does not make sense. And your proposed additions also,
IMO , do not make sense either.
[ 08-26-2004, 09:13 AM: Message edited by: Assassin ]