A few months ago, I posted a study comparing the best Bard I'd ever rolled with the best Mage/Thief (Elven, naturally) I'd rolled, both at the EXP cap for ToSC, and both with the best equipment that you would give to an NPC of each class. The Mage/Thief won by a mile. The Bard had about 15% more hitpoints, and had like 1 better THAC0 and maybe 2 better AC. Everything else was Mage/Thief all the way.
People say Bards are great for their versatility. Really? The Mage/Thief was able to reach 100% in Stealth, Pick Locks, AND Pick Pockets, not to mention being able to cast spells without stripping naked in the middle of a fight.
Thankfully, BG2 finally provides us with Elven Chain Mail, which allows the wearer to cast Wizard spells. Unfortunately, we also learn that Bards can't learn any spells past Spell Level 6, a handicap that does not apply to the Mage/Thief--who can also wear the Elven Chain Mail himself.
It's been my experience that when game designers give such a relatively weak ability as high Lore to a class, it's because they're trying to offset the class's obvious drawbacks.
I made my decision long ago:
Powergamers avoid Bards like the plague, if only to avoid their loser cooties.
Roleplayers don't mind taking on a Bard, but only if he or she's an interesting character--and even then they wouldn't have more than one at a time.
__________________
Volothamp's Comeuppance
Everything you ever needed to know about the entire Baldur's Gate series......except spoilers.
|