Quote:
Originally Posted by robertthebard
Wouldn't ending the recession mean there were more jobs, instead of less jobs? My understanding is that a recession means people aren't buying things. Unemployed people aren't buying things. Hence the recession isn't ended, and if unemployment keeps going, it's going to get worse long before it gets better.
He owned Osama based on the footwork laid out by the previous administration, however, he does get the nod since he was in power at the time. Why then, is it logical, to not blame him when things are spiralling downwards, instead of praising him? After all, if he gets credit for the good, he should get the blame for the bad, where it can be laid at his feet, anyway.
I did, however, live in interesting times as a youth. In retrosopect, I wouldn't change anything. Good times, bad times, all shaped the man I am.
|
This has also been said before more than once, I need to just maybe locate a handful of these threads and paste them as people forget the answers a few months later.
BTW I want to both note and remind you that I said he saved us from a Great Depression and you started talking about Recession - two different things.
But regardless, the recession ended in June of 2009. Which, if I was to take you up on your offer to place blame and credit, he also ended the recession atop catching Osama and averting a great depression. Sounds like a win, no?
I thought you were gonna tell us stories about your wildman days.