Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
The presumption you are making here is that conclucsive proof will support human-influenced global warming. My presumption is that there is no such proof possible because there are too many unknowns to attain conclusive proof.
|
Right, I agree with the scientific community.
Quote:
|
The phrase "it could be too late" is Chicken Little thinking--it presumes that whatever happens must by definition be negative. Why is the glass always half empty?
|
Always half-empty? Interesting way of viewing the situation. Science says that the result won't be good. It does not point to pollution as healing the planet, for example. Again, I fear by the time sufficient proof surfaces to put the naysayers at rest, it will be too late. That's just me, mind you. People may wise up beforehand, we can only hope. But again, it doesn't really matter anyways when you think about it. The people who can actually come up with ways to help the situation are already running with the science, so a minority of denial doesn't do anything but make for some interesting debates. Science has moved onward and upward.