Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
No, but I could take my laptop to a public wireless network, remote onto computer B, use Hide My IP (or something like it) to confuse where I really am, use computer B to remote onto computer C and then use computer C to commit some sort of crime or perform internet searches for "chloroform" or "hydrogen sulfide" or whatever and make it a) difficult to pinpoint my exact location and b) make it look like I am somewhere that I am not. That sure is a lot of work to break the law, though.
I think you meant to say "hearts are not for thinking". 
|
Lol Yeah that's what happens when you type with rented fingers.
Sure she could have used the wireless, but then again that wasn't brought up as evidence, so to factor that in would be called ASSuming facts not in evidence something a JURY is NEVER EVER EVER supossed to do. Minus any evidence of your phantom remote to computer, it's the old if a frog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass when he jumps. Hey she could have also steped through a time/space anomaly and been in two places at the same time.... hey we don't need any evidence for that just let somebody think it up and it has to be that way... rules of evidence... rules of evidence .... we don't need no stinkin' rules of evidence.