Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
I never followed this case at all; however, I do know the one name associated with this case that isn't getting the negative feedback that she should--Nancy Grace. Didn't she devote much of her show over the last couple of years to going on and on about how guilty Ms. Anthony was and that it was an open-and-shut case? The prosection had nearly three years to collect evidence to present at a trial and when they did so, the jury found it insufficient and/or inconclusive.
I think the real lesson here should be about the news media distorting a case before a trial begins, thus setting up unrealistic expectations in the general public.
|
Well, Nancy Grace-less is hardly media. She believes everyone accused of anything is guilty always, lol. She will scream about injustice, yet hosts her own show "Swift Justice" (a very lame and low-budget attempt at Judge Judy), where she dispenses "justice" in a matter of minutes to people who appear like they never get out of bed. Guess she has a dinner date to attend to or something. No time for little nuances like thorough investigations. Just an entertainer - if even. You should see when someone on her panel disagrees with her, she cuts the connection.