[Cerek]

Originally Posted by Timber Loftis I think I just said it, but in case I wasn't clear: You cannot argue there was no due process when the company met with the government and reached an agreement. I've negotiated cleanups on behalf of companies, and I can tell you from my experience an escrow to ensure the security of the money settled upon is almost always required.

Thanks for the explanation, TL. I didn't know the specifics of the initial agreement and a google search just kept returning links to Barton's apology.

It makes a lot of sense for the escrow to be set-up, especially in light of the Exxon Valdez experience, and $20 million is a minimal amount to make sure at least some efforts are made while BP goes through the due process.

I agree that Barton's actions seem to lead to only one conclusion about his true loyalties. Like you said, he's given his opponents all they will need to replace him next election.