[SpiritWarrior]

Well, let's see some evidence concerning the above statements/opinions. Links, photos etc. (preferably not from bloggers or pundents but rather, hard proof). I am hardly biased, I didn't like Gore until I saw his impressionable film. I always thought of him as boring before this.

Some quick points...

I don't think he's that braindead as to make a movie about global warming but never once think that anyone would look at his house. I'm not talking media even, just for example a person visiting him who liked his movie and possibly wanted to discuss it.

In the film, he is flying commerical alot, I don't know if it's an act for the movie which some may then suggest (?), but why even show him flying from airport to airport if it was something he wanted to hide?

100% profits from the film were put into an educational program for schools about environmental issues. If he wanted to hit big, why make a film then give the profits away?

I know nothing about the ownership of the carbon offset companies, and if he owns it. This is another instance where we need proof. I could rant on about how Bush is in bed with the oil companies and is steered by special interests all day every day but y'know...

Just to clarify, the judge in that case came to the conclusion that the film is basically accurate, save for 9 errors/exaggerations, but emphasized that the overall message was true and valid. Thousands of those copies were offered to schools absloutely free. Also thousands were offered to American schools for free, they were refused most likely due to the smear tactics run by Fox and friends on Gore.

I don't understand it, what does it matter if all the smears are true? Isn't the overall message noble, selfless? Would it hurt to make people, our kids and our grandkids aware? Do we suddenly stop listening to that song we love if the artist says something we don't agree with?

To end with a quote, "We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children."