Re: nuclear energy
I just don't see why the clean sources aren't a viable option. Yes, they need work to get them established correctly, there will be downtime, and money losses, but then there will be free, clean, continous and energy forever. And ever.
How are we not on this road yet? I mean, the conditions and climates of our own planet can provide us with a source of energy that is already running anyway but for the fact that we aren't converting it. The gains surely outweigh the losses. It would answer a huge part of the global warming issue, a huge part of the health hazard issue, and every part of the non-renewable energy issue. We could operate in a hybrid period as the changes get underway, then, like the casette tape and the CD, the older technology would simply phase out and become obsolete without anyone pushing it that way.
__________________
Still I feel like a child when I look at the moon, maybe I grew up a little too soon...
|