|
Oh, right, they found it in 2003 but despite all the criticism they were facing, it wasn't disclosed till 2006? Why would anyone believe that? They were getting shit from everyone for not having found something, if they really had, they would have plastered it all over the news the moment they found a vial containing the common cold.
And here's another thing: Why would Saddam's forces not have used the chemical weapons against the US invasion if they had them?
Finally: Considering the fact that this is nothing near what was claimed(What was it? Attemped nuclear capabilities? Anthrax? Sarin?), still means it was a false accusation that turned out badly. And even if something was found, there wasn't any evidence of it beforehand, it was pure luck that they stumbled across something.
PS: How does it matter who lied? The fact is that it was a false accusation that turned into a huge screw-up, and it's the same thing happening now. At least against Iraq they had the decency to doctor up some "evidence," but now they're just accusing without even attempting to prove.
PPS: If the US government actually believed Iran was on the verge of nuclear weapons, or actually had them, they wouldn't be attacking, because then they know it would probably end up being used against them or their forces in Iraq.
|